CENTRAL UTAH WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRlcr
SIXTH
ANNUAL
REPORT
The Central Utah Water Conservancy District
P.o. Box 427, Orem, Utah
Officers
Clyde Ritchie, President
Leo L. Brady, Vice President
Lynn S. Ludlow, Secretary-Treasurer
COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS
Board of Directors
Operation and Maintenance
Leo H. Haueter, Chairman; C. Rell Swensen,
H. LeRoy Morrill, Sterling D. Jones,
Royden G. Derrick, R. Roscoe Garrett
Public Relations and Information
Royden G. Derrick, Chairman ; Briant H. Stringham,
John A. Lambert, Wallace T. Jeffery, Sterling D. Jones
Finance
Leo P. Harvey, Chairman, Robert B. Hilbert,
Wm. J. Ostler, Wallace T. Jeffery, Briant H. Stringham,
Clifford L. Ashton - on special occasions
Personnel and Administrative
R. Roscoe Garrett, Chairman; C. Rell Swensen,
Leo P. Harvey, Clifford L. Ashton,
H. LeRoy Morrill, Wm. J. Ostler
Engineering and Construction
Robert B. Hilbert, Chairman ; G. Marion Hinckley,
L. Y. Siddoway, Virge N. Brown,
Leo H. Haueter, Charles W. Wilson
Legal and Legislative
L. Y. Siddoway, Chairman; Charles W. Wilson,
G. Marion Hinckley, John A. Lambert,
Virge N. Brown, Clifford L. Ashton
State Water Plan - Ute Indian Unit Coordinating Committee
Sterling D. Jones, Chairman ; Robert B. Hilbert,
L. Y. Siddoway. Leo H. Haueter,
Virge N. Brown, John A. Lambert
II
II
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Clyde Ritchie
Wasatch County
President
Leo L. Brady
Duckerne County
Vice President
Clifford L. Ashton Virge N. BroW11 Royden G. Derrick
Salt Lake County Upper Sevier River Salt Lake County
Counties
Leo Haueter
Duchesne County
H. LeRoy Morrill
Uintah C0101tU
Lynn S. Ludlow
General M «nager
Secretary
Robert B. Hilb ert
Salt Lake County
C. Marion Hinckley
Utah County
WiIlia", J . Ostler L. Y . Siddoway
Duchesne County Uintah Countll
Carl H. Carpenter Robert D. Berrett
District Engineer Office Manager
R. Roscoe Gar-rett Leo P. Harvey
Juab County Utah County
Wallace T . Jeffrey Sterling D. Jones
Millard Countll Utah County
John A. Lambert
Summit, Countll
Charles WilBon Briant H. Stringham C. Rell SweJlson
Salt Lake COUllty Uintah County Salt Lake COlmty
STAFF
SIXTH ANNUAL REPORT
This report summarizes activities of the Central Utah
Water Conservancy District for the year ending March 31, 1970.
It also includes an audit report of the District's financial condition
for the calendar year ending December 31, 1969.
Starvation Complex
Work on the $20 million Starvation Complex of the Bonneville
Unit Central Utah Proj ect, was completed in November,
1969. On November 10th the temporary coffer dam was
breached and water from Strawberry River began rising behind
the newly completed dam. Moments later water from the
Duchesne River was diverted at the Knight Diversion Dam,
which had been completed in 1968, thru the Starvation Feeder
Conduit to the new reservoir. This marked the first Complex
of the Bonneville Unit to be completed. Work on this Unit began
in March, 1967 and continued for 2% years until completion.
Starvation Reservoir is located on the Strawberry River
about 3 miles northwest of Duchesne. Most of the water to be
stored, however, will come from the Duchesne River through
the tunnel and feeder conduit which diverts the water at KnightDiversion
Dam. The 155 foot high Starvation Dam will provide
for the storage of more than 167,000 acre feet of water. The
water will be used to supplement the irrigation supplies on the
Duchesne River, provide for delivery of water to the Midview
Reservoir, and will also be used to replace water to be diverted
to the Bonneville Basin area through the Strawberry Aqueduct
now under construction.
Also included in the Starvation Complex is the relocation
of Highway 40. The old highway will be inundated as the reservoir
fills. A new bridge spanning an arm of the reservoir is
1,634 feet long, is Utah's longest over water, and is a part of the
6% mile long highway relocation.
STARVATION DAM - The dam was completed in November 1969.
Water from the Duchesne River was diverted for storage also in
November 1969.
Appropriations
The President's Budget for Fiscal Year 1971 recommends a
construction program of $12.9 million for the Bonneville Unit of
the Central Utah Project. The program provides for completion
of Water Hollow Tunnel and Open Channel No.2; and, acquisition
of land for the Strawberry Reservoir Enlargement and collection
works. Contracts will also be awarded for the construction
of Soldier Creek Dam; for Currant Creek Dam; Currant
Creek road rehabilitation; Water Hollow Diversion Dam and
pipeline; Layout Tunnel and access road; Layout Creek Diversion
Dam, pipeline, and feeder pipe; Currant Tunnel and access
road; and the relocation of U. S. Highway 40 to bypass the enlarged
Strawberry Reservoir. The program also provides for
initial land acquisition for the Jordan Aqueduct system, and the
awarding of a contract for construction of Jordan Aqueduct
Section 1.
The Jensen Unit of the Central Utah Project received an
initial appropriation of $500,000 in the President's budget. This
will provide for the continuation of design, and preparation of
designs and specifications for Tyzack Dam and Reservoir.
Rights-of-way will also be purchased with these funds. This was
one of two new Reclamation starts included in the President's
budget.
Construction Progress
In addition to the completion of the Starvation Complex.
the drilling of the 4.1 mile Water Hollow Tunnel was completed
March 12, 1970. The mole emerged after a drilling time of 16
months.
Bottle Hollow Dams and Dike, being constructed as fish
and wildlife mitigation facilities for the Ute Indian Tribe, are
now 53% complete. The two dams and the dike will create the
Bottle Hollow Reservoir near historic Fort Duchesne. The reservoir
and the recreational facilities will be operated by the Ute
Indian Tribe. Completion is scheduled for November, 1970.
At the close of the current fiscal year the following funds
will have been expended on the Bonneville Unit.
Planning Funds $4,981,033
Construction Funds
Fiscal Year 1966 $1,534,964
Fiscal Year 1967 3,591,777
Fiscal Year 1968 8,047,131
Fiscal Year 1969 11,355,976
Fiscal Year 1970 (Est.) 8,312,731
$32,842,579
Total Funds Expended $37,823,612
Water Studies - Utah & Juab Counties
The Engineering firm of Templeton, Linke & Alsup submitted
a report to the Board of Directors outlining municipal
water requirements and facilities needed in Juab and Utah
Counties by 1980, 2000 and 2020. The report is to be used by the
District to help schedule future water deliveries to the various
communities in the two counties.
The studies indicate that 10,740 acre feet of Central Utah
Project water should be available by 1980 to meet the needs of
the two counties. By 2000 the annual need will exceed 23,000
acre feet. It is anticipated that these water needs will coincide
with the timetable of Central Utah Project and District construction
so that water will be available when the demand
arises.
The report outlines a concept of water treatment facilities
and aqueducts to deliver water into both counties. Based on this
concept such a program could cost an estimated $12 million to
provide the facilities.
Artist's concept of the Jordan Water Treatment Plant.
Treatment Plant Progress
.-,,;
..... :;.,
Progress has continued during this past year on the proposed
Jordan Treatment Plant. The Engineering Firm of Templeton,
Linke and Alsup submitted a preliminary report to the District
showing two alternative designs. The District approved
the design to build the treatment plant to a capacity of 36
million gallons of water per day. This capacity will provide
for anticipated demands until about 1980, at which time the
second half of the plant can be constructed which would raise
the capacity to 72 million gallons per day. The District and
the USBR cooperated with water agencies and local governmental
officials in Salt Lake County to establish the final
location of the Jordan Aqueduct. The Aqueduct will deliver
water to and from the treatment plant.
The treatment plant is to be financed and operated by the
District and will treat water for Salt Lake County. The District
completed land purchases this past year for the treatment plant
site. The site is southwest of Riverton. It is anticipated that
construction will start in 1972 and be completed by 1974.
First Water Sales Contract Executed by the District
In March of 1970, Pine Hollow Estates, a summer home
recreational development company, contracted with the District
for 200 acre-feet of water in Starvation Reservoir. This is the
first water sales contract to be executed for Bonneville Unit
water.
Ute Indian Unit Feasibility Study
The Board of Directors approved an allocation of $100,000
to expedite the feasibility study for the $600 million Ute Indian
Unit of the Central Utah Project. The time involved in getting a
project of this magnitude authorized by Congress and under
construction takes many years. It is vital to keep the studies on
schedule so that the Unit will be ready for authorization in time
to meet the water needs of the late 1990's and to satisfy Indian
deferral agreements involved in the construction of the Bonneville,
Upalco, and Uintah Units. The Colorado River Basin Project
Act of 1968 directed the U. S. Bureau of Reclamation to
have a feasibility report completed on the Unit by December
31, 1974. With the contribution of the District and the continued
appropriations from Congres, work can proceed in an orderly
manner to complete studies and coordinate with Utah State
Water Planners. To keep within the timetable of supplying
water when it will be needed it is essential that the State and
Federal Governments as well as the District proceed with studies
and develop plans to meet the State's future water needs.
Special Coordinating Committee Named
A special committee of the Board was named in May, 1969
to work with the State Board of Water Resources on the State
Water Plan. This committee will coordinate the District's activities
and work closely with State Water Planners on the Ute
Indian Unit of the Central Utah Project. This mammoth project
could directly or indirectly affect every area of the state.
The Ute Indian Unit is now only a concept but when completed
it will provide for Utah's water needs from 1990 to 2020.
It could develop Utah's remaining entitlement to Colorado River
water, make it readily available in both the Bonneville and
Uintah Basins, and from Salt Lake to Garfield Counties. By
River Basin exchanges it could affect the entire state. It is essential
that close coordination in all areas of the State be maintained
so that everyone's water interests are protected.
J
1
r
1
J
1
All Of Sanpete County Now In District
During the past year all of Sanpete County was annexed
into the District. The Board of Directors approved the County's
petition and Fourth District Court Judge Maurice Harding signed
the court order December 31, 1969.
The District agreed to give its verified consent to the petition
after three conditions were met. The stipulations were:
(1) That Sanpete County residents be notified of the specific
benefits they will receive if all the County is included
in the District.
(2) That Sanpete County be advised it will be included in
that part of the District's Sevier River Basin Division
which includes West Garfield, South Sanpete, Sevier
and Piute Counties, and that that portion of the Division
is represented on the Board by one director with
one-half vote.
(3) That Sanpete County and Carbon County offiCials be
advised that the District does not propose to intervene
in present water conflicts between the two Counties.
With the inclusion of the entire County in the District the
whole Sevler River Basin is now within the District, and it will
be possible to coordinate and have better water management for
the entire basin. The District will also be able to assist in
municipal and industrial water development.
The new District area now includes
over 25,000 square miles and is
approximately 33% of the state's
total land area.
Participation in Salt Lake County Water and Sewer Planning
The District is participating in the Salt Lake County Water
and Wastewater Association. The Association is composed of
technical representatives of all water and wastewater entities
in Salt Lake County, and serves as an advisory group to the
Salt Lake County Council of Governments. It is anticipated that
the activities of this group will provide for cooperation in the
future water supply of the County.
STARVATION DAM - This newly completed dam i8 already
storing water and will have limited recreational activities in 1970.
CONSTRUCTION
BOTTLE HOLLOW DAM - The reservoir, when completed, will
be the center of the new recreation complex being constructed for
the Ute Indian Tribe near Roosevelt.
J
RELOCATION OF HIGHWAY 40 - This recently completed
bridge is the longest in Utah over water. It is 1634 feet long and
114 feet high.
PROGRESS
WATER HOLLOW TUNNEL - The drilling of this 4.1 mile long
tunnel was completed in March 1970 when the "mole" holed through
{picture at left} . This man standing in tunnel shows the size of
the tunnel {picture at right}.
Summary
The Board of Directors of the Central Utah Water Conservancy
District believe that much progress was made by the
District during the past year. If the President's budget and
recommended program for Fiscal Year 1971 is achieved the
Bonneville Unit of the Central Utah Project will be engaged
in a more progressive construction program. The Directors are
dedicated to continuing progress in the affairs of the District
so that the citizens within the District and the State of Utah
will receieve the future benefits of water-resource development.
For the Board of Directors
Central Utah Water Conservancy District
Clyde Ritchie
President
Appendix:
Officers & Committee Assignments
CPA Audit Report
H AYNIE AND STAKER
C ERT."" ED PUISLIC ACCOU NTANTS
SALT LAKE CI T Y , U TAH 8 4101
March 6. 1970
The PreSident and Board of Directors
Central Utah Water Conservancy District
Orem. Utah
"'NMots o r ... "ItfC..lII IN''''''''1
orCI ..... rICO~kJCACCoU .. r .... '.
We have examined the balance sheet of the Central Utah
Water Conservancy Distr ic t as of December 31', 1969. and the related
statements of revenue and expenses and surplus for the year then ended .
Our examination was made in accordance with generally accepted
auditing standards , and accordingly included such tests of the accounting
records and such other auditing procedures as we conside'red necessary
in the c i rcumstances .
In our opinion, the accompanying balance sheet and
statements of revenues and expenses and surplus present fairly the
financial position of the Central Utah Water Conservancy District at
December 3 1 , 1969, and the results of its operations for the year the n
ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles
applied on a basis consistent with that of the preceding year.
p::...<q';:~ . .-( J,-J> 4---'~
//
Certified Public Accountants
BALANCE SHEET
December 31. 1969
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash on hand ..... . ... . . ..... .. . . . . . .. . . ... .. .. .. . ..... . .... • .. . ..... $ 50
Cash in banks .. . . . . .... . .. . . .. . .. ..... . .. .. .. . .... . . . . . ..... ... ..... 1,918
Property taxes in custody of county treasurers .... . . ..... . .... . . . .. .. .. . 479,050
Invested in United States Government securities .........•.. • . . •... ... . . 1.728,574
Accrued interest on securities owned . .. . .......... • ........ . .... . . ... .
Prepaid insurance ........................ . . . . ... .. . .. ..... .. . . . . .... .
Total current assets . ... . ... . .. . . .. . ... . ...... . .. ..... . . . ...... .
Property. plant and equipment. at coat
Water system:
Land . . . .. . . . .... . . . . .. . . . ... . . . .. .... . . . ... .... . . .. .. . . $102,819
Treatment plant (engineering) . .. ... .......•..•.. • .. . . . . ..
Land and landscaping for office .. .. . . ... .... . . . ... . ......... .
Office building ....... . . . . . ... . .. . ... ...... . .. . . . .. .. . . ..... .
Office furniture and equipment ..... . .... . . .. . . . . .... .. .. . .. .
67,021
46,267
191,666
32,836
440,609
Less accumulated depreciation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . 14,148
23,026
61
2,232,679
Net property, plant and equipment .. . . . . . . . . . ....... . ......... . . 426.461
Other assets:
Advance to Bureau of Reclamation
Organization expense .... .. .... . .... ... ....•.. • ... . ... . ......
Water rights ........ . .. ... .... . . . .. ... ... .... . .. .... . ...... .
Total other assets ......... . ......... . . . ..... ....... ... .
40,000
1,345
100
41 ,445
Total assets ......•..•..........•... . . •...... ... . .. . .. .... . $2,700,585
LlABlLmES
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable . . .. . . ............. . ...... . .. .......•.....•..•...... $ 7,221
Accrued payroll taxes and retirement ..... .. .. . ... . . . ........ . . ... . ... . 1,590
Total current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,811
Surplus (note) ............. . .... . ......... ... .... ... ...... . .. . . . .. . .. . ..... 2,691,774
Total liabilities and surplus . .. . .. .. . .. ........ . ........... . ..... $2,700,585
Note: On June 13, 1969, the Board of Directors a f the District voted to appropriate $100,000
and make it available to the Bureau of Re clamation to expedite the feasibility study
of the Ute Indian Unit. A contract was si gned with the Bureau of Reclamation on
February 16, 1970, and it is expected tha t this $100,000 will be requested about
April 1, 1970.
STATEMENT OF REVENUES AND EXPENSES
Revenue:
Revenue from tax assessments ... . . ,. " . " ... ....... , . . , . . , ......... .. $1,067,183
Interest income .. ........ . .. . . . . , .. ..... . . . , .. , .. , . , . . , .. , . . , . . .. .... 87,389
Other revenue ............ . . . ..... , .. , . ......... , . . , . . , .... . .. ,. .... 831
Total revenue .... , .. . . . , .. , .... , .. , . . , . . , .. , . ....... .. , ... ..... 1,155,403
Expenses:
Personnel and services
Staff ....... ... ....... , . . , .. , . .. ........... ... . . ... . . .. .. $44,358
Legal . .... . . . . . . , .. . .. , ... . , . . , .. , .. , .... .. . . .. , .. , . . . . .. 10,339
Directors . .... , .... . . . . , . . , . . , ....... . .. , .. , .. , . . , . . . . . . . 9,500
Engineering . .... . . , ... .. .... . ...... , .. , ..... . . ... , .. , . . . . 8,610
Audit .. .. .. ......... . . . ........ , .. ..... , .. , . . . . .......... 380
Public relations . ................. ... ... , ....... ,......... 1,800
Total personnel and services ... , . . , . ,.. .. . . ........... . . . 74,987
Travel expense:
Directors ..... ...... ... ... . .... ...... " .. .. $12,753
Staff and other .............. . . . . ... , .. , . . . .. 5,865
Total travel expense ...... . . .. . , .. . . ,.. ..... . ...... ..... 18,618
Other operating expenses:
Assessing and collecting taxes .. . , .. . . , . .... , . . . 5,636
Utilities . . . . . . ........ ... . ..... , ... . . . .... , . . . 3,899
Public information ............. , . . . . ... ... , ... 3,479
Retirement . . .......... . .. . . . , , . , .. , ..... , . .. 2,152
Payroll taxes .. . . . . .... . .... , . . .. , .. , ........ 2,134
Telephone and telegraph .. . . . ........ ... , ..... 1,656
Postage and mailing ......... , .......... ,..... 1,642
Repairs and Maintenance . . ... , .... , , . , . . , . . . . . 1,465
Office supplies ...... . ... . .. . .. , . . , .. . ... .... 1,356
Printing ....... . . ......... . , .. , .. , . . . .... , . ... 1,320
Insurance . . . ... . ... . . . . . ... .. . , . . . .. , . . . . . . . 904
Custodial expense ....... . .... . . . . , ... . . . . . .. 679
Other ............ .............. .. .. .... . .... 796
Total other operating expenses
exclusive of depreciation ....... . .... , .. , ..... . ........ 27,118
Uintah Water Conservancy District .. .... ... , . . . .. , .. .. , . . . . ... .. 17,000
Special studies . . .. . ... . . .... ...... . .. ... . . ..... , . .... . . . .. ,... 3,600
Total expenses exclusive of
depreciation .. .. . .. .. . . ... . . . ... .. , . . , ... ... .... , .. , . . . ... .. . 141,323
Net income before depreciation ..... .. .... , ...... . , ..... , .......... , .. , . . . . . . 1,014,080
Less depreciation .. . . . ... . . .. ..... , .... . , ....... . . . , .. , ..... . ..... . . , ...... 7,144
Excess of revenue over expenses ....... ..... ...... .. , .. , . . . . . . ..... . . , .. . ... $1,006,936
STATEMENT OF SURPLUS
Balance at January 1, 1969 ... ... ... . ......... . . ..... ... . .. , ........... .. .... $1,679,474
Add:
Adjustment for engineering fees paid in 1968
capitalized to treatment plant .................. , .. , ... . .. .. .. ,. . ... 5,364
1,684,838
Add:
Excess of revenue over expenses for year ended
December 31, 1969 ... .. . ...... ... . ..... . ....... . .. , .. , .. .... . . . . .. 1,006,936
Balance at December 31, 1969 .... . . . . .. .... . . . , . . , . . , ..... ... .. , . ... . .. , . .... $2,691,774
" )
r
' ,!
I}.;
J
L'
..l ....
ill
j
:'1>
G
'..,'
,, .'7-,
" I ,· t',
..... t
..
'.1
:i'i
....
't
" ,
"
Q
, I
; ,
<-;,.:
,l;, o
h
tr
~
C,-
.' '::U
\j)
U
,-"j
' ~.
~ ,
"
~
t)
~
i.'i
r~
.:
'-
Bonneville Unit
Central Utah Project
Utah Needs Your Help With The Bonneville Unit
The Bonneville Unit of the Central Utah Project is a vital Utah water resource
project now under construction. President Carter and his environmental advisors
say that construction of this unit is unnecessary and should be stopped.
The Presidents Advisors Are Wrong
The 'UXlter to be provided from the Bonneville Unit is essential to every Utah
citizen and to you to provide these essential needs.
Jobs - Food Production - Energy Development - Domestic Water - Flood
Control- Recreation - Transportation - Housing - Income For Schools
Growth - Construction
This Is Why They Are Wrong
To provide the essential needs as listed, Utah water leaders have for years planned
jointly with the Federal Government and with the support of the U. S. Congress
to plan and construct this needed water project. The Presidents advisors are
wrong, in stopping the construction of the Bonneville Unit and other essential
water projects. The State of Utah and you must have water, food, energy, and
common-sense environmentalist if we are to maintain a sound, productive, livable
environment for Utah and the Nation.
The Bonneville Unit Is A Sound and Wise Investment
For the United States
In addition it ...
• permits natural growth and increased tax revenues
• provides jobs during and after construction
• provides increased agricultural production to meet the Nation's food requirement
• permits Utah to develop its energy resources to meet the Nation's needs (oilcoal
- oil shale - geothermal - hydro electric)
.•. and many other benefits.
J
1
The President Has Been Misled By His Advisors
Here Are A Few Examples:
• They say too many people live along Utah's Wasatch Front - Should the
Executive Department of the Federal Government tell you where to live?
• They say there are alternative sources of water - The Pacific Southwest InterAgency
Committee (Federal - State Technicians) conclude after comprehensive
studies toot there are no alternative sources of water for rapidly growing areas
of Utah that are to receive water from this unit.
• They say the unit reduces fishing and recreation opportunities - The unit is
essential to provide growing fish and recreation demands.
• They say the unit jeopardizes Indian Water Rights - The unit, which has
Indian support, develops the facilities essential for the Indians to use their
water.
• They say this unit adversely affects the Colorado River and should not be constructed
- The adverse problems of development of the Colorado were recognized
by the seven states years ago. These states have accepted the problems of
the river as joint responsibility and each state by compact is entitled to develop
their fair share of water from the river. The problems of the river should not
be placed on Utah's back.
• They say the unit is not needed - Being so concerned as to water needs, the
Utah 1977 Legislature, with the Governor concurring, unanimously requested
the President of the United States to continue with the funding and the construction
of the Bonneville Unit.
Its Real - Not Fiction
With your help the Congress of the United States can protect our future. They
can guarantee an essential welter supply, which will permit a natural growth for
Utah, and will enhance the development of the worlds richest energy storehouse
to contribute to meet the Nation's needs.
The continuing growth in our population
plus the increasing pressures and demands for
enhancement of our social and economic wellbeing
create steadily growing demands for
water. As the late Senator Robert Kerr said,
"We can bequeath our children cities of Iron
and Stone and Aluminum; but we had better be
sure we give them the water to make them
livable."
C.U.W.C.D. Central Utah Wate1· Conservancy District, P. O. Box 427, Orem, Utah 84057
'.
<1
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o :x:
<1 <1 > fW::
J
Zo
o
o
o
o
MErlWPO ITAN WATER
OISTRICT1 OF AMERICAN- 1 FORI(
MET POL/TAN WATER -~ UTA
OISTR} OF OREM 'LAM
} ,
___ T O_O l..h..L _ C CL ~ ) '"" <OJ ?,
I ,/
I
I
MILLARD COUNTY WATER
CCNSERVANCY (}ISTRICT
~ SANPETE t COUNTY
WATER
CONSER VA ftCY
DISTRICT
DISTRICT
o
~~-W.~~~~~~~~~C ~O~_~o~~ ~
CO a:
BEAV ER CO' _~r-. _ . ......:
IRON CO-E
L 0 __C_ O _
CO
------
w
~
w
w y 0
U T
CONSERVANCY
J UCHES"E CO
CARBON CO
--- - ---
////(//111/1/4
000000
M N G
--~ A H
FLAMING GORGE
RES
OISTR UINTAH WATER
CONSERVANCY OISTRICT
9 9 9 ~q~~9~f~' ~\ .' .~Q~!~' ''f~' ~9~w.~
EXPLANATION
Cen tral U tah Water Conservancy District Boundary
County Boundary
Metropolitan Water District Boundaries
EXlstinQ Water Conse r vancy District Boundaries
ex:
4:
0
f-
...J
::J
N.
!
A
