2 ; 1
I apprec your letter d critique of ovem r 21 0 our state
on a Conetr\lctio - esou.rc Use. pp rently t constru.
critioism of ay admini tr tion.
in the Lo
appl1 on ..
th prlnc1pl that the co t protect major eaources normal 008
o road co tructi.on. I bellev the ar constructive and 80\Ul(1
t co end.ation does DOt imply a diversion of fun • Prevalent
philosophy 1. one of eoODOmy i Bbi hway use tf fun. contend that
,n.D·~ay ra ar not a 8 public. Collectively. they are t peopl
who deriv a living. or eaaur t fro . ource affec by highway. "the
n fits to Q carmot be considered at the expen of t other. TIler
adeqUa proc e t 1nclu the courts. to protect prl 1Dtereat. blie
intere8ts-- tural reaour "'-00 DOt enjoy similar protection.
reasons, the recomm ndatton that t e coa of rotecUng re ources
.. oW be conald red a normal co t of hlghway conatrucUo.n.
I quite agree that our probl sunderstandi. iV1OU81, t
we are all inter. d in 1 r ¥ highway Y tem, with full conalde tlo of
all i at t lncludln tutur resource use. It re my hope that our statement
furthers that abn.
co: Governor George • yde
Yours inc , ly,
Click tabs to swap between content that is broken into logical sections.